South Korea's national team hearing saw the request to name Son Heung-min (34, LA FC) and Hwang Hee-chan (30, Wolverhampton Wanderers) as witnesses withdrawn after public backlash.

Why were Son and Hwang initially named?

MP Lim Oh-kyung announced on social media on July 10 that the application was made to consider party opinions and players' schedules, aiming to scrutinize the national team coach appointment and KFA operations. Critics argued the two players had club commitments and that the hearing's focus did not involve them directly.

What sparked the criticism?

Critics pointed to schedule conflicts and feared the hearing was turning into a political show. Son had just played a 1-0 loss to South Africa on 2026-06-25, and Hwang was tied to Wolverhampton's calendar. Demanding their attendance was seen as unreasonable, especially as South Korea sits 3rd in the World Cup group with 3 points, a recent form of LLW, and a goal difference of -1.

Lim's final decision

Lim stated, "The hearing must not become a one‑sided session," emphasizing that without player input, reform is meaningless. He therefore removed Son and Hwang from the witness list, meaning they will not appear at the hearing. This move aligns with South Korea's current performance, where the team has recorded 1 win, 0 draws, and 2 losses, recent form LLW, and remains 6 points behind leaders Mexico.

What lies ahead?

The hearing continues, and former coach Hong Myung-bo pledged to answer questions, noting that "the responsibility for results rests with the coach." The Korean Football Association promises transparent, fair governance. Observers hope this controversy will spur stronger management and a more credible national team ahead of the 2026 World Cup.